Bibliographic references

1 - Jeremić, Dragan V., et al. “Short-term follow-up of kinematically vs. mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty with medial pivot components: a case-control study.” Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research 106.5 (2020): 921-927. I

2 - Sosio C., et al. “Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Kinematic Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty with a Medial Pivot Design: Two-Year Follow-Up.” J.

Clin. Med. (2023), 7258. I

3 - Suzuki L., Hellman J., et al. “Calipered kinematic alignment restored the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle, achieved high satisfaction and improved clinical outcomes.” Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. (2024):1228-1239. I

4 - Ettinger M., Windhagen H., et al. “Higher satisfaction and function scores in restricted kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment with medial pivot design total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomised controlled trial.” Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. (2024):1275-1286. I

5 - Calliess T, et al., “PSI kinematic versus non-PSImechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study.” Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2017):1743 - 8. I

6 - Howell S.M. et al., “The Forgotten Joint Score after total knee arthroplasty with a kinematic alignment-optimized femoral component matches total hip arthroplasty.” Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. (2025). I

7 - Ziv, Yaron Bar, et al. “Patients undergoing staged bilateral knee arthroplasty are less aware of their kinematic aligned knee compared to their mechanical knee.” Journal of Orthopaedics 23 (2021): 155-159. I

8 - Morra E.A., Greenwald A.S., “Simulated kinematic performance of The GMK-Sphere Total Knee Design During A Stand to Squat Activity” Study Report (2013). I

9 - Hossain F, et al., “Knee arthroplasty with a medially conforming ball-and-socket tibiofemoral articulation provides better function”, Clin Orthop Relat Res. (2011):55-63. I

10 - Banks S. et al, “In Vivo Kinematics of a Medially Conforming & Rotationally Unconstrained TKA Design”, Podium presentation at the 27th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty, Kyoto, Japan, September 25-27, (2014). I

11 - Schütz P., et al., “Kinematic Evaluation of the GMK Sphere Implant During Gait Activities: A Dynamic Videofluoroscopy Study.” J Orthop Res. (2019): 2337-2347. I

12 - Stambough J.B., et al., “Flexion Instability After Total Knee Arthroplasty.” J Am Acad Orthop Surg. (2019): 642-651. I

13 - Scuderi G.R., et al., “Surgical approaches in mini-incision total knee arthroplasty.” Clin Orthop Relat Res. (2004):61-67. I

14 - Schroer et al., “Mini-subvastus approach for total kneearthroplasty.” J of Arthroplasty. (2008): 19-25. I

15 - Boerger T.O., et al, “Mini-subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty.” Clin Orthop Relat Res. (2005):82-87. I

16 - McAllister et al., “The impact of minimally invasive surgical techniques on early range of motion after primary total knee arthroplasty.” J of Arthroplasty (2008): 10-18.

17 - AMIS Publication Review. M.O.R.E. Journal Supplement, April 2016.

18 - Laude F. Total hip arthroplasty through an anterior Hueter minimally invasive approach. Interact Surg (2006) 1: 5-11.

19 - Dora C. Minimalinvasive Zugänge an der Hüfte. Orthopäedie Mitteilungen 6/07, 574-576.

20 - Vasina PG, Rossi R, Giudice GM, Palumbi P. Hip arthroposthesis through the anterior minimally invasive approach. Sphera 2010;6(12) – Speciale Ortopedia.

21 - Jayankura M, Roty M, Potaznik A, Rooze M, Cermak K, Remy P, Gillard B, Biltiau N, Schuind F. Isokinetic and isometric muscle strength recovery after total hip arthroplasty implanted by direct anterior approach. Podium presentation at the 10th Annual Congress of the EFORT, Vienna, Austria, June 3-6, 2009.

22 - Patient matching femoral implants for THA – One stem type does not fit all (no date) MEDACTA TV. Available at: https://more.medacta.tv/videos/hip-video/patient-matching-femoral-implants-for-tha-one-stem-type-does-not-fit-all.

23 - The Clinical Evidence. Ref. 99.PFAM. CL Rev. 01. Data on File Medacta.

24 - De Meo F, Ascani D, Cacciola G, Bernardoni M, Cavaliere P. VALIDATION OF MYHIP PLANNER AND MYHIP VERIFIER SOFTWARE: 3D PLANNING AND INTRAOPERATIVE VERIFICATION IN TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY. Orthop Procs. 2020;102-B(SUPP_1):53-53. doi:10.1302/1358-992X.2020.1.05.

25 - Moralidou, M.; Di Laura, A.; Henckel, J.; Hothi, H.; Hart, A.J. Accuracy of a Three-Dimensional (3D)-Printed Patient-Specific (PS) Femoral Osteotomy Guide: A Computed Tomography (CT) Study. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 667. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9110667